Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 35F does not require mandatory pre-deposit in legacy...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debit.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 35F does not require mandatory pre-deposit in legacy service tax appeals to be paid exclusively in cash or prohibit use of validly transitioned CENVAT credit. Credit carried forward under transitional provisions remains a vested credit, and its entry in the Electronic Credit Ledger preserves the right to utilise it. An administrative instruction requiring cash payment cannot restrict that statutory entitlement where no requirement exists to use the Electronic Cash Ledger. Debit of transitioned credit, resulting in credit to the Government, therefore satisfies the pre-deposit requirement. The Tribunal's contrary order was quashed, and the appeal was directed to be heard on merits.
Section 35F does not require mandatory pre-deposit in legacy service tax appeals to be paid exclusively in cash or prohibit use of validly transitioned CENVAT credit. Credit carried forward under transitional provisions remains a vested credit, and its entry in the Electronic Credit Ledger preserves the right to utilise it. An administrative instruction requiring cash payment cannot restrict that statutory entitlement where no requirement exists to use the Electronic Cash Ledger. Debit of transitioned credit, resulting in credit to the Government, therefore satisfies the pre-deposit requirement. The Tribunal's contrary order was quashed, and the appeal was directed to be heard on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
