Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Ratification by the competent appointing authority can validate...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretion.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Ratification by the competent appointing authority can validate an unauthorised acceptance of resignation retrospectively, relating back to the initial acceptance. An employee who sought waiver of notice, accepted separation benefits and certification, and obtained new employment cannot subsequently challenge the completed resignation on a technical defect in initial acceptance. Under statutory service rules making resignation effective upon acceptance, communication of acceptance and the date of actual relieving do not postpone its legal effect. Although withdrawal before relieving may ordinarily be permitted, the competent authority may refuse it for recorded, communicated and rational reasons. Judicial review does not replace that discretion absent mala fides, perversity or illegality.
Ratification by the competent appointing authority can validate an unauthorised acceptance of resignation retrospectively, relating back to the initial acceptance. An employee who sought waiver of notice, accepted separation benefits and certification, and obtained new employment cannot subsequently challenge the completed resignation on a technical defect in initial acceptance. Under statutory service rules making resignation effective upon acceptance, communication of acceptance and the date of actual relieving do not postpone its legal effect. Although withdrawal before relieving may ordinarily be permitted, the competent authority may refuse it for recorded, communicated and rational reasons. Judicial review does not replace that discretion absent mala fides, perversity or illegality.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.