Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment additions based solely on material gathered after reopening cannot survive where no addition or modification is made on the issue that formed the basis for reopening. Although the Explanation to section 147 permits assessment of subsequently noticed income after a valid reopening, the Tribunal applied the principle that this power depends on making an addition on the foundational reopening issue. The condition applies equally to reassessment following search where section 148A procedure is dispensed with. As the Revenue did not establish any addition based on material available at initiation, all additions arising from subsequent enquiries and verification were deleted. Both appeals were allowed, with remaining grounds left open.
Reassessment additions based solely on material gathered after reopening cannot survive where no addition or modification is made on the issue that formed the basis for reopening. Although the Explanation to section 147 permits assessment of subsequently noticed income after a valid reopening, the Tribunal applied the principle that this power depends on making an addition on the foundational reopening issue. The condition applies equally to reassessment following search where section 148A procedure is dispensed with. As the Revenue did not establish any addition based on material available at initiation, all additions arising from subsequent enquiries and verification were deleted. Both appeals were allowed, with remaining grounds left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.