Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Reassessment additions based solely on material gathered after reopening cannot survive where no addition or modification is made on the issue that formed the basis for reopening. Although the Explanation to section 147 permits assessment of subsequently noticed income after a valid reopening, the Tribunal applied the principle that this power depends on making an addition on the foundational reopening issue. The condition applies equally to reassessment following search where section 148A procedure is dispensed with. As the Revenue did not establish any addition based on material available at initiation, all additions arising from subsequent enquiries and verification were deleted. Both appeals were allowed, with remaining grounds left open.
Reassessment additions based solely on material gathered after reopening cannot survive where no addition or modification is made on the issue that formed the basis for reopening. Although the Explanation to section 147 permits assessment of subsequently noticed income after a valid reopening, the Tribunal applied the principle that this power depends on making an addition on the foundational reopening issue. The condition applies equally to reassessment following search where section 148A procedure is dispensed with. As the Revenue did not establish any addition based on material available at initiation, all additions arising from subsequent enquiries and verification were deleted. Both appeals were allowed, with remaining grounds left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.