Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Termination of a share purchase agreement required prominent disclosure under the LODR Regulations where the listed entity had conspicuously announced approval of the acquisition. Mentioning the termination only in small print within a note to unaudited financial results, rather than in the principal board-meeting communication, was treated as no disclosure because investors rely on information about financial position, proposed ventures and collaborations. The complaint-dismissal communication was set aside, and SEBI and the stock exchange were directed to re-examine the mandatory-disclosure issue and issue appropriate orders within four weeks.
Termination of a share purchase agreement required prominent disclosure under the LODR Regulations where the listed entity had conspicuously announced approval of the acquisition. Mentioning the termination only in small print within a note to unaudited financial results, rather than in the principal board-meeting communication, was treated as no disclosure because investors rely on information about financial position, proposed ventures and collaborations. The complaint-dismissal communication was set aside, and SEBI and the stock exchange were directed to re-examine the mandatory-disclosure issue and issue appropriate orders within four weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
