Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Vicarious liability for dishonoured company cheques may extend to non-signatory directors where complaints contain foundational responsibility avermen...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95832 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Laser imagers that merely print diagnostic data received from other equipment lack independent diagnostic capability and are accessories rather than diagnostic instruments or apparatus. Chapter 90 Note 2(b) permits classification of an accessory with a machine only where it is solely or principally suitable for use with a particular kind of machine or machines under the same tariff heading. Because the imported laser imagers were compatible with equipment classifiable under both CTH 9018 and CTH 9022, they could not be classified with either group and fell under the residuary rule in Note 2(c). They were consequently classifiable under CTH 9033 00 00, not CTH 9018 90 19.
Laser imagers that merely print diagnostic data received from other equipment lack independent diagnostic capability and are accessories rather than diagnostic instruments or apparatus. Chapter 90 Note 2(b) permits classification of an accessory with a machine only where it is solely or principally suitable for use with a particular kind of machine or machines under the same tariff heading. Because the imported laser imagers were compatible with equipment classifiable under both CTH 9018 and CTH 9022, they could not be classified with either group and fell under the residuary rule in Note 2(c). They were consequently classifiable under CTH 9033 00 00, not CTH 9018 90 19.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.