Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
First appellate authorities must examine assessment issues and decide appeal grounds through a reasoned, speaking order even when the appellant is absent; statutory appeals should not ordinarily be dismissed solely for non-prosecution without merits adjudication. In reassessment concerning unexplained cash deposits, contemporaneous material plausibly explaining non-representation required an effective opportunity to substantiate the depositor's explanation. The appellate order was set aside and the reassessment dispute remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after reasonable and effective hearing, subject to the assessee's cooperation and production of supporting evidence.
First appellate authorities must examine assessment issues and decide appeal grounds through a reasoned, speaking order even when the appellant is absent; statutory appeals should not ordinarily be dismissed solely for non-prosecution without merits adjudication. In reassessment concerning unexplained cash deposits, contemporaneous material plausibly explaining non-representation required an effective opportunity to substantiate the depositor's explanation. The appellate order was set aside and the reassessment dispute remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after reasonable and effective hearing, subject to the assessee's cooperation and production of supporting evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
