Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
First appellate authorities must examine assessment issues and decide appeal grounds through a reasoned, speaking order even when the appellant is absent; statutory appeals should not ordinarily be dismissed solely for non-prosecution without merits adjudication. In reassessment concerning unexplained cash deposits, contemporaneous material plausibly explaining non-representation required an effective opportunity to substantiate the depositor's explanation. The appellate order was set aside and the reassessment dispute remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after reasonable and effective hearing, subject to the assessee's cooperation and production of supporting evidence.
First appellate authorities must examine assessment issues and decide appeal grounds through a reasoned, speaking order even when the appellant is absent; statutory appeals should not ordinarily be dismissed solely for non-prosecution without merits adjudication. In reassessment concerning unexplained cash deposits, contemporaneous material plausibly explaining non-representation required an effective opportunity to substantiate the depositor's explanation. The appellate order was set aside and the reassessment dispute remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after reasonable and effective hearing, subject to the assessee's cooperation and production of supporting evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
