Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Erroneous classification of interest as tax in Form GST DRC-07 can improperly trigger the statutory pre-deposit required for a further GST appeal. The notes state that the demand for wrong availment and delayed reversal of input tax credit comprised ITC reversal, interest and penalty, with no disputed tax component; however, interest was recorded as tax and affirmed in appeal. Although the original order was later rectified, limitation prevented correction of the appellate order. The appellate order was set aside and remitted for fresh merits adjudication because a Tribunal appeal would otherwise require pre-deposit on interest wrongly treated as tax.
Erroneous classification of interest as tax in Form GST DRC-07 can improperly trigger the statutory pre-deposit required for a further GST appeal. The notes state that the demand for wrong availment and delayed reversal of input tax credit comprised ITC reversal, interest and penalty, with no disputed tax component; however, interest was recorded as tax and affirmed in appeal. Although the original order was later rectified, limitation prevented correction of the appellate order. The appellate order was set aside and remitted for fresh merits adjudication because a Tribunal appeal would otherwise require pre-deposit on interest wrongly treated as tax.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.