Constitutional personal-liberty safeguards limit PMLA twin bail conditions where completed investigations lead to prolonged incarceration before trial...
Automated airline software subscriptions without human intervention fail technical-services characterisation and do not make available underlying tech...
Business support recruitment and training receipts qualify for presumptive business taxation, not professional taxation under technical consultancy ru...
Treaty exemption for foreign permanent-establishment management fees prevailed, while dividend expense disallowance remained limited to an accepted al...
Centralised assessment transfers: participation after requesting centralisation can bar technical jurisdictional challenges, while assessment disputes...
Binding precedent remains operative despite pending challenge, supporting deletion of interest disallowance when debt is converted into preference sha...
GST law recognises uploading a show-cause notice on the GST portal as valid service, so absence of physical delivery does not prevent the recipient from responding. Because the notices were available on the portal but no response was filed, a natural justice challenge based solely on non-service was rejected. Following cancellation of registration for non-filing of returns, statutory remedies for revival and appeal were available but not pursued. The writ remedy could not be used after expiry of the appeal period to bypass the statutory scheme, including pre-deposit requirements; merits such as subsequent filing of returns were left for statutory appeal. The writ petition was therefore dismissed.
GST law recognises uploading a show-cause notice on the GST portal as valid service, so absence of physical delivery does not prevent the recipient from responding. Because the notices were available on the portal but no response was filed, a natural justice challenge based solely on non-service was rejected. Following cancellation of registration for non-filing of returns, statutory remedies for revival and appeal were available but not pursued. The writ remedy could not be used after expiry of the appeal period to bypass the statutory scheme, including pre-deposit requirements; merits such as subsequent filing of returns were left for statutory appeal. The writ petition was therefore dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4907 
