Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Input tax credit cannot be denied solely because a supplier's registration was cancelled retrospectively; the authorities must examine whether the purchaser proved actual receipt of goods through invoices, e-way bills, lorry receipts and similar records. Because that genuineness inquiry was not undertaken and most transactions predated the cancellation order, the assessment orders were set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration after giving the petitioner a reasonable opportunity.
Input tax credit cannot be denied solely because a supplier's registration was cancelled retrospectively; the authorities must examine whether the purchaser proved actual receipt of goods through invoices, e-way bills, lorry receipts and similar records. Because that genuineness inquiry was not undertaken and most transactions predated the cancellation order, the assessment orders were set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration after giving the petitioner a reasonable opportunity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.