Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Allegations of coercive GST recovery during search failed where panchnamas, the written undertaking and recorded answers showed the taxpayer admitted the liability, agreed to pay after temporary registration, and stated the statement was made without pressure or threat; prolonged silence without complaint also undermined the coercion plea. FORM GST DRC-04 issued later was treated as mere acknowledgment of voluntary payment, with no prescribed time limit and no prejudice shown. Refund was unavailable because the tax, interest and penalty had been voluntarily discharged on the basis of search material, and refund lies only where tax was not payable or was paid in excess.
Allegations of coercive GST recovery during search failed where panchnamas, the written undertaking and recorded answers showed the taxpayer admitted the liability, agreed to pay after temporary registration, and stated the statement was made without pressure or threat; prolonged silence without complaint also undermined the coercion plea. FORM GST DRC-04 issued later was treated as mere acknowledgment of voluntary payment, with no prescribed time limit and no prejudice shown. Refund was unavailable because the tax, interest and penalty had been voluntarily discharged on the basis of search material, and refund lies only where tax was not payable or was paid in excess.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
