Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Reasonable opportunity must be given before a fraud-based GST demand is confirmed where input tax credit has already been reversed and revenue interest is otherwise protected. The HC held that the petitioner could not be denied the chance to produce material documents to show genuine supply of goods and to challenge the invocation of Section 74. The impugned order was interfered with only to that limited extent, and the matter was remitted for fresh reconsideration after giving the petitioner a fair opportunity. No finding was returned on the merits of the underlying tax dispute.
Reasonable opportunity must be given before a fraud-based GST demand is confirmed where input tax credit has already been reversed and revenue interest is otherwise protected. The HC held that the petitioner could not be denied the chance to produce material documents to show genuine supply of goods and to challenge the invocation of Section 74. The impugned order was interfered with only to that limited extent, and the matter was remitted for fresh reconsideration after giving the petitioner a fair opportunity. No finding was returned on the merits of the underlying tax dispute.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
