Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Section 74 does not permit a single show-cause notice to club multiple financial years, because limitation is linked to each relevant financial year and a consolidated notice would unlawfully extend the five-year period for earlier years. The impugned notice and consequential order were therefore treated as de hors the statute and without jurisdiction. The alternative-remedy rule was also held to be only a self-imposed restraint: where the defect is ex facie jurisdictional and apparent on the record, writ relief remains maintainable despite an available statutory appeal.
Section 74 does not permit a single show-cause notice to club multiple financial years, because limitation is linked to each relevant financial year and a consolidated notice would unlawfully extend the five-year period for earlier years. The impugned notice and consequential order were therefore treated as de hors the statute and without jurisdiction. The alternative-remedy rule was also held to be only a self-imposed restraint: where the defect is ex facie jurisdictional and apparent on the record, writ relief remains maintainable despite an available statutory appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.