Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Effective service of a show cause notice requires more than a portal display: if the notice is not placed in the prescribed "View Notices and Orders" window and no copy is separately served, the recipient is denied a reasonable opportunity to reply. Absence of a personal hearing before adjudication further breaches natural justice and vitiates the consequential order. Where the defect goes to procedural fairness, the High Court may entertain writ jurisdiction despite an alternate appellate remedy, quash the notice and order, and remit the matter for fresh adjudication after reply and hearing.
Effective service of a show cause notice requires more than a portal display: if the notice is not placed in the prescribed "View Notices and Orders" window and no copy is separately served, the recipient is denied a reasonable opportunity to reply. Absence of a personal hearing before adjudication further breaches natural justice and vitiates the consequential order. Where the defect goes to procedural fairness, the High Court may entertain writ jurisdiction despite an alternate appellate remedy, quash the notice and order, and remit the matter for fresh adjudication after reply and hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.