Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
GST notice and adjudication order issued against a deceased proprietor were unsustainable because foundational proceedings taken in the name of a dead person are void. The consequential recovery steps, including freezing of the bank account, also failed as they depended on invalid proceedings. The High Court quashed the notice, order and recovery action, while reserving liberty to initiate fresh proceedings against the legal heir if permissible in law.
GST notice and adjudication order issued against a deceased proprietor were unsustainable because foundational proceedings taken in the name of a dead person are void. The consequential recovery steps, including freezing of the bank account, also failed as they depended on invalid proceedings. The High Court quashed the notice, order and recovery action, while reserving liberty to initiate fresh proceedings against the legal heir if permissible in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.