Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Contractual claims for reimbursement of GST in post-GST works contracts arise from the agreement between contractor and employer, but they do not alter the statutory scheme for levy, assessment, recovery and enforcement of GST. Any reimbursement direction operates only against the employer under the contract and cannot be enforced against tax authorities or the State. The statutory GST framework also cannot be bypassed through directions permitting revised returns contrary to the Act, or by granting waiver of statutory interest and penalty, or relaxation of the prescribed limitation for returns and revised returns. The impugned order was therefore confined to the contractual reimbursement issue and set aside to the extent it conflicted with GST law.
Contractual claims for reimbursement of GST in post-GST works contracts arise from the agreement between contractor and employer, but they do not alter the statutory scheme for levy, assessment, recovery and enforcement of GST. Any reimbursement direction operates only against the employer under the contract and cannot be enforced against tax authorities or the State. The statutory GST framework also cannot be bypassed through directions permitting revised returns contrary to the Act, or by granting waiver of statutory interest and penalty, or relaxation of the prescribed limitation for returns and revised returns. The impugned order was therefore confined to the contractual reimbursement issue and set aside to the extent it conflicted with GST law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.