Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
In a GST short-payment dispute, the HC noted that once outward supply was correctly disclosed in GSTR-1, the corresponding tax still had to be paid in GSTR-3B for the relevant period, so mere invocation of the stricter provision did not by itself warrant interference. After considering the later amnesty framework and the GST Council material, the Court treated the matter as one arising from return-filing glitches and admitted-liability mismatch capable of examination under the lesser provision. The demand and penalty order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.
In a GST short-payment dispute, the HC noted that once outward supply was correctly disclosed in GSTR-1, the corresponding tax still had to be paid in GSTR-3B for the relevant period, so mere invocation of the stricter provision did not by itself warrant interference. After considering the later amnesty framework and the GST Council material, the Court treated the matter as one arising from return-filing glitches and admitted-liability mismatch capable of examination under the lesser provision. The demand and penalty order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.