Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
On materially identical facts, the adjustment for PTSE services, IT support services and centralized support services was unsustainable because the assessee had already shown rendition of services through agreements, invoices, emails, cost allocation workings and third-party evidence, and the earlier co-ordinate Bench had rejected a nil arm's length price. No distinguishing feature was shown for the year under consideration, so the binding earlier decision had to be followed. Mere pendency of the revenue's appeal did not dilute that precedent absent any stay or reversal. The transfer pricing adjustment was therefore deleted and the appeal allowed.
On materially identical facts, the adjustment for PTSE services, IT support services and centralized support services was unsustainable because the assessee had already shown rendition of services through agreements, invoices, emails, cost allocation workings and third-party evidence, and the earlier co-ordinate Bench had rejected a nil arm's length price. No distinguishing feature was shown for the year under consideration, so the binding earlier decision had to be followed. Mere pendency of the revenue's appeal did not dilute that precedent absent any stay or reversal. The transfer pricing adjustment was therefore deleted and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.