Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rule 11UA leaves the assessee free to choose the DCF method for valuing unquoted shares, and the Assessing Officer may test the report and assumptions but cannot replace that method with NAV merely of his own preference; on the facts noted, the independent investor's participation and response to notices supported the genuineness of the transaction, so the share-premium addition under section 56(2)(viib) was unsustainable. On section 14A, no disallowance could be made because no exempt income was earned during the year, and the Finance Act, 2022 amendment was held prospective, so it did not apply to AY 2018-19.
Rule 11UA leaves the assessee free to choose the DCF method for valuing unquoted shares, and the Assessing Officer may test the report and assumptions but cannot replace that method with NAV merely of his own preference; on the facts noted, the independent investor's participation and response to notices supported the genuineness of the transaction, so the share-premium addition under section 56(2)(viib) was unsustainable. On section 14A, no disallowance could be made because no exempt income was earned during the year, and the Finance Act, 2022 amendment was held prospective, so it did not apply to AY 2018-19.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.