Suppressed outward supplies require transaction-wise verification and reasoned findings before diary entries can support tax and penalty determination...
Unverified judicial precedents cannot sustain customs reassessment treating the speaking-order deadline as directory when cited decisions are disclaim...
Struck-off companies cannot pursue declarations or injunctions over contractual rights without restoration, despite the statutory saving for recoverie...
Departmental appeal limits permit discretionary exceptions, while penalties for technical e-way bill lapses in genuine transactions require evasion in...
For GST demand proceedings on input tax credit mismatch, limitation for the 2017-2018 period was treated as not expired because the Covid-19 interval was excluded under the limitation extension orders and Section 168A; scrutiny of returns under Section 61 and issue of Form ASMT-10 were also relied on to find suppression, supporting invocation of the extended period under Section 74. The challenge to the shift from intimation to notice was rejected, and the writ petition was dismissed with liberty to pursue the statutory remedy on merits.
For GST demand proceedings on input tax credit mismatch, limitation for the 2017-2018 period was treated as not expired because the Covid-19 interval was excluded under the limitation extension orders and Section 168A; scrutiny of returns under Section 61 and issue of Form ASMT-10 were also relied on to find suppression, supporting invocation of the extended period under Section 74. The challenge to the shift from intimation to notice was rejected, and the writ petition was dismissed with liberty to pursue the statutory remedy on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4947 
Get Daily Updates 
