Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Recovery by bank account attachment under the A.P.V.A.T. Act cannot proceed without proof of service of the show-cause notices and assessment orders. The High Court found that the respondents produced no material showing service, and the asserted affixture after returned postal service was unsupported by proof. In the absence of demonstrated service, it held that the assessment orders had not been served on the petitioner, set aside the bank account attachment, and directed fresh service of the assessment orders on counsel, to be treated as service on the petitioner. The petitioner was left free to pursue statutory remedies and seek stay in accordance with law.
Recovery by bank account attachment under the A.P.V.A.T. Act cannot proceed without proof of service of the show-cause notices and assessment orders. The High Court found that the respondents produced no material showing service, and the asserted affixture after returned postal service was unsupported by proof. In the absence of demonstrated service, it held that the assessment orders had not been served on the petitioner, set aside the bank account attachment, and directed fresh service of the assessment orders on counsel, to be treated as service on the petitioner. The petitioner was left free to pursue statutory remedies and seek stay in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.