Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deduction of tax at source under section 194J is not conclusive of professional income; tax authorities must independently examine the true nature of receipts before denying presumptive taxation under section 44AD. In the cited matter, the Tribunal set aside the appellate order and restored the case for fresh examination and de novo assessment because the receipts had been treated solely on the basis of the payer's TDS deduction, without an independent enquiry, and the assessee was to be given a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Deduction of tax at source under section 194J is not conclusive of professional income; tax authorities must independently examine the true nature of receipts before denying presumptive taxation under section 44AD. In the cited matter, the Tribunal set aside the appellate order and restored the case for fresh examination and de novo assessment because the receipts had been treated solely on the basis of the payer's TDS deduction, without an independent enquiry, and the assessee was to be given a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
