Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Government salary grant received by a charitable trust under a binding condition for use only in salary payments was treated as a tied-up receipt and excluded from the income base for accumulation under section 11(1)(a). The Tribunal held that accumulation is available only in respect of income held under trust that is at the assessee's disposal and capable of being applied or set apart at its discretion; here, the trust acted merely as a conduit without dominion or beneficial control. The Bombay HC ruling in CIT v. Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council was distinguished because it concerned characterisation of grants as income, not their inclusion in the accumulation base.
Government salary grant received by a charitable trust under a binding condition for use only in salary payments was treated as a tied-up receipt and excluded from the income base for accumulation under section 11(1)(a). The Tribunal held that accumulation is available only in respect of income held under trust that is at the assessee's disposal and capable of being applied or set apart at its discretion; here, the trust acted merely as a conduit without dominion or beneficial control. The Bombay HC ruling in CIT v. Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council was distinguished because it concerned characterisation of grants as income, not their inclusion in the accumulation base.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
