Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that exemption under section 10(46) depends on the nature of the receipt and not on the year in which it is recognised in the accounts. Prior period regulatory receipts such as licence fees, advances and other regulatory income remained exempt because they were intrinsically linked to the statutory functions of the Commission, and the corresponding addition was deleted. The Tribunal also held that incidental non-commercial receipts, including interest on House Building Advance, personal use of office vehicle, miscellaneous income and related interest receipts, were ancillary to the exempt regulatory activity and retained their exempt character. The additions on both counts were therefore unsustainable and were directed to be deleted.
ITAT held that exemption under section 10(46) depends on the nature of the receipt and not on the year in which it is recognised in the accounts. Prior period regulatory receipts such as licence fees, advances and other regulatory income remained exempt because they were intrinsically linked to the statutory functions of the Commission, and the corresponding addition was deleted. The Tribunal also held that incidental non-commercial receipts, including interest on House Building Advance, personal use of office vehicle, miscellaneous income and related interest receipts, were ancillary to the exempt regulatory activity and retained their exempt character. The additions on both counts were therefore unsustainable and were directed to be deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.