Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 194H was treated as inapplicable to prepaid distributor discounts, the controversy having already been covered by the Supreme Court decision cited in the text. On that basis, and noting that the refund application had been made and the revenue itself accepted that refund was due, the Court directed immediate release of the TDS refund. The department's plea that an outstanding demand under the TAN should be adjusted against the refund was left open for separate pursuit, and the petitioner was left free to contest any such demand in accordance with law. The refund was ordered to be released forthwith, without prejudice to either side's rights on the separate demand.
Section 194H was treated as inapplicable to prepaid distributor discounts, the controversy having already been covered by the Supreme Court decision cited in the text. On that basis, and noting that the refund application had been made and the revenue itself accepted that refund was due, the Court directed immediate release of the TDS refund. The department's plea that an outstanding demand under the TAN should be adjusted against the refund was left open for separate pursuit, and the petitioner was left free to contest any such demand in accordance with law. The refund was ordered to be released forthwith, without prejudice to either side's rights on the separate demand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
