Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that foreign salary earned in Sweden and credited to a Swedish bank account formed part of a foreign asset for Black Money Act purposes, so any taxability would arise only in the year the asset came to the AO's notice, not in the year the salary was earned. On the facts, information reached the Department only in November 2021, making the AY 2016-17 addition unsustainable. The Tribunal also applied Article 15(1) of the India-Sweden DTAA and section 90(2) of the Income-tax Act, holding that the salary was not chargeable to tax in India because the employment was exercised in Sweden for a Swedish resident employer. The additions for AY 2016-17 and AY 2018-19 were deleted.
The ITAT held that foreign salary earned in Sweden and credited to a Swedish bank account formed part of a foreign asset for Black Money Act purposes, so any taxability would arise only in the year the asset came to the AO's notice, not in the year the salary was earned. On the facts, information reached the Department only in November 2021, making the AY 2016-17 addition unsustainable. The Tribunal also applied Article 15(1) of the India-Sweden DTAA and section 90(2) of the Income-tax Act, holding that the salary was not chargeable to tax in India because the employment was exercised in Sweden for a Swedish resident employer. The additions for AY 2016-17 and AY 2018-19 were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
