Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
Disciplinary proportionality requires penalties for Authorised Representative misconduct to match proven harm, leading to reconsideration of registrat...
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not be sustained where society charges and depreciation were disallowed only for want of supporting evidence or by following earlier years, because the claims were fully disclosed in the books and return and no false or inaccurate particulars were found. In an unabated year, additions under section 153C could not rest on routine disallowances without incriminating material. The Tribunal upheld deletion of the penalty, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not be sustained where society charges and depreciation were disallowed only for want of supporting evidence or by following earlier years, because the claims were fully disclosed in the books and return and no false or inaccurate particulars were found. In an unabated year, additions under section 153C could not rest on routine disallowances without incriminating material. The Tribunal upheld deletion of the penalty, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
