Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

threshold exemption in case of abatement

AMARISH TIWARI

Dear Sir,

My client is a transporter , he can claim abatement of 75%, He has just taken  service tax registration,  number, how should i caculate threshold limit of Rs.10 Lac?

He will come in tax after turnover of 10  lac or after turnover of 40 Lac( because he will claim 75% abatement that will come to 30 Lacs, then he will claim threshold exemption Rs. 10 Lacs.as per my point of view)

thanking you

CA>Amarish Tiwari

Transporter Service Tax Threshold: Calculate on Aggregate Payments, Not Post-Abatement. Liability Begins at Rs. 10 Lakh Turnover. A client, a transporter, seeks advice on calculating the service tax threshold limit of Rs. 10 lakh, considering a 75% abatement. The discussion clarifies that the threshold is based on the aggregate payments received, not the post-abatement amount. The client will be liable for tax after reaching a turnover of Rs. 10 lakh, not Rs. 40 lakh. Experts agree that the value before abatement should be considered for the threshold calculation. Corrections were made regarding the notification numbers relevant to the issue. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
rajkumar shukla on Jan 2, 2012

As  per explanation (B) in the Nofn.1/2006 "Aggregate value not exceeding ten lakh rupees' means the sum total of first consecutive payments received during a financial year towards a gross amount, as prescribed under section 67 of the Finance Act charged by the service provider towards taxable services till the aggregate amount of such payments is equal to ten lakhs.Thus it implies that for computing 10 lakhs, payments received are to be counted and not the amount after abatement.

NANDKUMAR SAGWEKAR on Jan 3, 2012

 while calculating the limit of Rs.10 Lakhs , the value of taxable services on which service receiver has to pay the service tax not to taken into consideration. In instance case your client is service provider and provides taxable services of Rs. 17 Lakhs during the F Y but out of which taxable value of service (GTA ) to the Specified category of service receiver say Ltd Company or excisable dealer is Rs.12 Lakhs and others Rs. 5 Lakhs then also he is able to claim the Small service provider exemption of Rs.10 Lakhs .

While calculating the limit of Rs. 10 Lakhs , value before abatement to be considered and not after.

 

Thanks

 

ANAND SHEMBEKAR

CELL NO. 91-9421187122

 

NEERAJ KUMAR, RANCHI on Jan 3, 2012

Yes I do agree with the views presented above. Your client will come in tax only after turnover of Rs. 10Lac and not after 40 Lacs.

AMARISH TIWARI on Jan 5, 2012

Dear Mr.Raj kumar shukla,ANAND SHEMBEKAR & NEERAJ KUMAR, RANCHI,

I am very grateful to you for reply of my query on service tax threshold exemption

 

CA.AMARISH TIWARI

9827073629

BHOPAL

rajkumar shukla on Jan 5, 2012

welcome mr. Tiwari.I have checked up and found that I have mentioned wrong notfn. no.In fact  It is  6/2005 and 1/2006. To that extent, I would like to correct  myself.  Raj kumar shukla

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues