Just a moment...

Top
Help
🚀 New Feature Launched

Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.

  • ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
  • 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision

Try it now in Case Laws

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Search on 14.03.2022, however notice issued after Finance Act 2024

Mukul Panpher

Where a search under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act was conducted on 14.03.2022 in the case of a third party and certain documents allegedly pertaining to the assessee were found therein, the AO issued a notice under Section 148 dated 25.03.2025 to the Assessee.

On the date of issuance of the impugned notice, which Finance Act was in force. As Finance Act, 2024 came with effect from 01.09.2024 whereby Explanation 2 to Section 148 stood omitted . Consequently, the statutory deeming fiction treating third-party search material as “information suggesting escapement of income” was no longer available to the Assessing Officer. 

In the absence of the said deeming provision, proceedings against an “other person” could be initiated only after strict compliance with the mandatory procedure prescribed under Section 148A, including issuance of show-cause notice under Section 148A(b), grant of opportunity of hearing, and passing of a reasoned order under Section 148A(d). So is the notice dated 25.03.2025 legally valid ?

(AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues