Just a moment...

Top
Help
🚀 New Feature Launched

Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.

  • ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
  • 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision

Try it now in Case Laws

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

consolidated orders for fy 2019 -20, 2020-21 issued

giri gattupalli

respected sir, consolidated order in FORM DRC-07 issued on my client for FY 2019-20. 2020-21 in sep 2022. issue is still pending with ADC. in recent times high courts are strucking down composit orders.  as the limitation period  for FY 19-20, 2020-21 is crossed, is there any chance to get re assed for FY 2019-20, and 2020-21, if high court struck down the composite order.

thanking you

Composite GST assessment orders and reassessment prospects if High Court strikes them down and remands for fresh adjudication. Composite GST assessment orders issued in one FORM DRC-07 for multiple fiscal years can be struck down for procedural infirmity, which typically leads to remand for fresh adjudication; if remanded, the department may obtain a new limitation window for reassessment under the statutory provision permitting a fresh period to pass separate orders, so reassessment for FY 2019-20 and 2020-21 becomes possible. The limitation analysis distinguishes time for issuing show cause notices (which remains critical) from the time for passing orders (treated as recommendatory in some views). Departmental reliance on extended assessment provisions and favourable case law supports reassessment where procedural defects require reissuance of separate orders. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Shilpi Jain Yesterday

Limitation period applies for issuance of the show cause notice. The time limit in the law of 1 year given for passing of orders is not mandatory but more recommendatory.

So on limitation you cannot contest (Assuming SCN is issue in time). However, you can consider approaching courts for challenging composite SCN and order by consulting a professional in this regard as the analysis will differ based on facts of each case.

Sadanand Bulbule Yesterday

There are judgements which support and oppose such composite SCNs. There is no harm in taking a chance as indicated by madam.

VENU K Yesterday

High Courts may strike down composite orders due to procedural infirmities, it is highly probable that the matter would be remanded for fresh adjudication. In such a scenario, Section 75(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 would provide a fresh two-year period for the department to issue separate orders for FY 2019-20 and 2020-21, allowing for reassessment. Therefore, there is a significant chance of reassessment for these financial years if the High Court strikes down the composite order and remands the case.

KASTURI SETHI Yesterday

                        In case Section 74 has been invoked in the SCNs,  it is worthwhile to peruse the following case laws which are  in                                    favour  of the department :-

                          (i) (2026) 38 Centax 135 (S.C.) [07-11-2025]

                         (ii) (2025) 35 Centax.150 (Delhi High Court) (26.08.25)

                              Mathur Polymers  Vs. UOI

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues