Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Search — Coming Soon!

AI-powered research trained on the authentic TaxTMI database.

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

GST- Refund of pre deposit- rejection of refund on the ground that electronic liability register shows negative balance

PRASAD MVS

A GST demand of Rs 2 Crores was confirmed, and the same was reflected in the Electronic Liability Register (ELR). An appeal was filed against the said order by making a redeposit of Rs 20 lakh, resulting in a reduction of demand to 1.80 Crore in ELR. Subsequently, the appeal was allowed, and the entire demand was set aside, and APL 04 was issued. As the entire demand of 2 Crores was reduced in ELR, a negative balance of 20 lakhs was shown in ELR, thereby indicating that a refund of Rs 20 lakhs is due from the department. A refund claimed was filed. A notice was issued to reject the refund claim on the ground that, as a negative balance was indicated in ELR, the same can be adjusted against future demands, and hence, the refund of the pre-deposit cannot be sanctioned. The apprehension of the department, if a negative balance remains even after the sanction of a refund, the same might be utilised for future demands, resulting in excess payment.

As per FAQ (https://tutorial.gst.gov.in/userguide/ledgers/Tax_Liability_Ledger.htm)

It was intimated that on the sanction of the refund of the pre-deposit, ELR will get updated accordingly. Any information on the GST form through which ELR will get updated upon the sanction of the refund

Pre-deposit refund: pre-deposits are refundable and should be sanctioned with interest despite negative ELR balances. Entitlement to refund of a pre-deposit arises where an appellate order sets aside the demand and ELR reflects a negative balance; pre-deposits are not taxes and should not be retained for adjustment, refund should be sanctioned with statutory interest, and ELR is administratively updated on sanction of the refund. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
KASTURI SETHI Yesterday

Refund cannot be denied. The departments stand is incorrect.

"Refund of pre-deposit - Pre-deposit does not partake character of a Tax or duty, being sums deposited by assessee solely for purposes of pursuing Its remedy of appeal - VAT authorities neither entitled in law to retain the pre-deposit amount nor could it have been utilized for adjustment purposes - Section 38 of Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004. [para 38]."---------- Delhi High Court in the case of Flipkart India Pvt. Ltd. - 2023 (8) TMI 987 - DELHI HIGH COURT

KASTURI SETHI Yesterday

Since GST Acts are based on the pattern of VAT Act, so the judgement of Delhi High Court is squarely applicable to the instant case.

Sadanand Bulbule Yesterday

Pre-deposit is one of the conditions to file an appeal before the FAA/GSTAT. So once the appeal order is in favour of the appellant, deposit must be refunded with mandatory interest under Section 115 of the Act.

Sir has rightly pointed out settled legal position. Department is always under discomfort as far as refunds are concerned and it is merciless while initiating recovery.

KASTURI SETHI Yesterday

Rightly observed, Sir.

KASTURI SETHI Yesterday

Pre-deposit is not a payment of duty but only a pre-deposit for availing right of appeal-- Bombay High Court in the case UOI Vs. Suvidhe Ltd. reported as 1996 (82) ELT.177.

Upheld by Supreme Court reported as 1997 (94).ELT, A 159 (SC)

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues