1. Under the GST framework governed by the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, taxability depends on whether a receipt qualifies as "consideration" for a "supply" under sections 7 and 2(31).
A grant-in-aid received from Government / Government body / Government Board to meet revenue expenditure or working capital does not automatically attract GST. The decisive test is whether the grant is linked to, or in return for, any identifiable supply of goods or services by the recipient to the grantor or any third party.
Where the grant is in the nature of financial assistance, budgetary support, or subsidy, given without any obligation to supply specific goods/services, and not tied to performance, output, or contractual deliverables, it does not constitute "consideration". In such cases, the transaction falls outside the scope of "supply" and no GST is leviable.
Conversely, if the grant is conditional and performance-linked, such that the recipient is required to undertake specific activities, provide services, or deliver measurable outputs (e.g., operating a facility, executing a project, or providing services on behalf of the Government), the grant assumes the character of consideration. In that event, it becomes a taxable supply, unless specifically exempted.
Further, as per section 15(2)(e), subsidies directly linked to the price, excluding those provided by the Central or State Governments, are includible in value. However, Government subsidies are excluded from transaction value, though this exclusion does not override taxability if the payment itself is consideration for a supply.
Grant-in-aid for meeting running expenses or working capital is not taxable per se. GST applicability arises only where the grant is quid pro quo for a supply. Each case must be examined based on the terms of sanction, attached conditions, and nexus with supply, applying the "substance over form" principle.
Thank you Sir..