Just a moment...

Top
Help
The Most Awaited - AI Search is Live! 🚀

AI-powered research trained on the authentic TaxTMI database.

Launch AI Search
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

GST-Claiming of Input on Import of Goods in IMS

DK AGGARWAL

Dear Expert

We are importing the goods and claiming the INPUT as per the IGST paid by us as per Bill of Entery of Custom whether the details of BE appearing in the 2A or 2B as per rules.

Now in the recent IMS system we have to claim the INPUT of  BE as appering in the IMS.

We note that few of the old entries of BE for the year 23-24 and 24-25 are now reflected in IMS against which we have already claimed INPUT in the past.

Should we reject the BE entry  in IMS as we have aledy claimed INPUT earlir

Or--we should keep pending

Or --accept and then reverse

Please give the solution

Regards

D Aggarwal

Import of goods ITC: do not reject repopulated BE entries; pending or accept-and-reverse to avoid double claim. Do not reject historic Bill of Entry entries repopulated in IMS; either keep them pending or accept and then eliminate double availing of Input Tax Credit by making corrective adjustments in the GSTR-3B reporting or by recording the required reversal, and notify the tax department of the corrective action. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
NYAYASETU LEGAL ASSOCIATES LLP on Jan 30, 2026

Best way is to keep that pending, your confusion is genuine but due to limited options available on IMS it would be better if keep it pending rather than rejecting.

Raam Srinivasan Swaminathan Kalpathi on Jan 30, 2026

This is a persisting issue for imports - belated population in 2A/ 2B. I for one would advise acceptance of the same forthwith. Please remember that the ITC has already been availed by the RTP in their previous 3B Returns. Nevertheless, please ensure that there is no double availing of ITC in 3B. You may manually reduce the ITC amount (after acceptance) to the extent already availed in Table 4A(i) of 3B. That, to my mind, would be the appropriate procedure.

Shilpi Jain on Jan 31, 2026

Best is not to reject. Accept and reverse and also make an intimation to the department.

Shilpi Jain on Jan 31, 2026

Reversal can be done in table 4B2 of 3B

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues