Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID : 3061
- 0 -

Queries u/s.269T of the I.T.Act

Date 09 Jun 2011
Replies2 Answers
Views 6649 Views

QUERIES SECTION

Under section 269T of the IT Act  repayment of account payee cheque or account payee bank darft drawn in the name of persion who has made the loan. But if the repayment is by way of transfer of goods or through sale of goods. Is it violation of section 269T or not.

Kindly clearify the position with citation of case laws.

2 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
- 0
Replied on Jun 9, 2011
1.

Section 269 T attracts only when the money changes hand. Since there is no money transaction in your case, it would not attract 269 T. a citation can be given as follows:

Acceptence or repayment through Journal Entry would not come within the ambit of the words ‘loans or deposits’-section 269SS applies only where money passes from one person to another by way of ‘loan or deposit’[CIT v. Noida Toll Bridge Co. Ltd. 262 ITR 260 (Del.)]

- 0
Replied on Jun 26, 2011
2.

When an accounting adjustment is made for goods sold or goods purchased, there is no payment or receipt of money. In case of sale there is creation of receivables and such receivables can be adjusted from any amount payable to the concerned party.

 

The party  should be  the same- from whom loan was taken and goods are sold. In such a situation, usually understanding is revised that the loan be treated as advance for supply of goods. This can be confirmed by the party.

Similarly in case of stock transfer ( presumably to agent) the amount received from agent is in nature of advance or securiity deposit against consignment and not loan. Even if initially it was loan, on understanding of stock transfer the loan assumed character of advance or security deposit agaisnt stock transfer. Necessary document for confirmation can be exchanged between parties.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues