Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

whatsappJoin Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

EWB clerical error but SCN received transporter

MUTHUKUMARAN K

i am transporter FY 2021-22 Importer raised EWB against Bill of Entry but wrongly mention transporter name instesed of supplier name. now we got notice from state government Commercial tax office. Importer paid duty and IGST all of them. now we got notice in Section 61,73 and 50 of the CGST/TNGST Act 2017. we clearely explain but they raised SCN and order issued. how to make a complaint .

with regards

K.Muthu Kumaran

9500098134

Clerical error in e way bill may be rectified or challenged by appeal with pre deposit or rectification application. Transporter named in the e way bill instead of supplier was a clerical error; importer discharged duty and integrated tax and accounting records correspond. Minor e way bill inaccuracies should be treated leniently and do not automatically attract additional tax or penalty if there is no mismatch with books. Adverse orders may be challenged by appeal with requisite pre deposit or by judicial review, or the adjudicating authority may be asked to rectify the record using the statutory rectification procedure. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Sadanand Bulbule on Aug 11, 2025

The error is purely clerical in nature. The goods were duly accounted for in books of accounts and corresponding tax liability was discharged at the time of import. There is no evasion or short payment of tax involved.

CBIC Circular No. 64/38/2018-GST dated 14.09.2018 (para 5) clarifies that minor errors in E-Way Bill, which do not indicate any intention to evade tax, should be treated leniently and not attract penalty under Section 129 of the CGST Act. Therefore the authorities do not have jurisdiction to fasten tax lability based on E-way bill errors, if there is no mismatch with books of account.

E-way bill is designed to capture the details of transaction on Real time basis and it loses its significance once the goods are delivered to the consignee. In fact, tax invoice is the backbone of the transaction/supply and not the E-way bill per se.

Shilpi Jain on Aug 12, 2025

You need to file an appeal which will also require you to pay a pre-deposit.

If the amount involved is huge you can also consider filing a writ before High Court assuming you have submitted sufficient documentary evidence at the time of reply to SCN and those have not been considered by the adjudicating authority.

Sadanand Bulbule on Aug 12, 2025

Alternatively you may convince the adjudicating authority to invoke Section 161 to rectify the errors. 

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues