Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

General penalty under Section 125

MAHTAB KHAN

An assessee delays filing GSTR-3B, Section 47 of the GST Act already prescribes a late fee, which is paid. AO still impose a general penalty under Section 125 for the same delay. When the Act already imposes a late fee under Section 47 for late filing of GSTR-3B, and the same has been paid, on what basis is an additional penalty under Section 125 justified? Is this not double penalty for one lapse? The AO’s imposition of Section 125 penalty is legally sustainable??

No Additional Penalty Under Section 125 If Late Fee Paid Under Section 47 for GSTR-3B Delays When an assessee delays filing GSTR-3B and pays the late fee under Section 47 of the GST Act, imposing an additional penalty under Section 125 is not legally justified. Section 125 penalties apply only when no penalty under Section 47 is levied. The late filing is considered a minor breach without fraudulent intent or gross negligence, and additional penalties would contradict legislative intent and principles of natural justice. Courts have ruled against imposing Section 125 penalties alongside Section 47 late fees, affirming that the late fee is the sole penalty for such delays. Therefore, the imposition of a general penalty under Section 125 in these circumstances is unsustainable and can be contested. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues