Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

ITC CLAIMED BEYOND TIME LIMIT u/s 16(4)

MAHTAB KHAN

During scrutiny, department has alleged that ITC of ?1,39,878 (CGST Rs. 69,939 + SGST Rs. 69,939) pertaining to FY 2021-22 (March 2022) was wrongly availed because GSTR-3B for March 2022 was filed on 19-12-2022, i.e., after the last date prescribed under Section 16(4) (30th Nov 2022). Department proposes recovery under Section 73, with interest under Section 50 and penalty under Section 122.

Are there any favourable judgments / circulars / relief under Section 16(4) in such cases?

Kindly share your expert views. ??

Delayed GSTR-3B Filing Makes ITC Availment Time-Barred Under Section 16(4), Triggering Recovery, Interest and Penalty A taxpayer availed ITC of Rs. 1,39,878 (CGST/SGST) for March 2022, but filed GSTR-3B on 19-12-2022, beyond the Section 16(4) deadline of 30-11-2022. The department initiated recovery under Section 73 with interest (Section 50) and penalty (Section 122). Contributors state that post-FY 2020-21 no extension/relief exists, and the demand is legally sustainable as the availment itself violates Section 16(4), irrespective of sufficient balance or non-utilization of ITC. One view suggests that if ITC remained unutilized, interest and penalty may not apply, but others emphasize that the contravention is complete on wrongful availment, supported by Supreme Court precedent. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues