Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 2997
Like 0 Bookmark

Penalty on addition of 40A(b)

Date 07 May 2011
Replies 1 Reply
Views 1377 Views
Penalty under 271(1)(c) inapplicable to additions under 40A(2)(b) for excess interest to relative where no concealment.
Addition for excess interest paid to a relative was treated under Section 40A(2)(b) as a disallowance for related party interest; a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was held inapplicable because the adjustment stemmed from an allowability issue rather than concealment or inaccurate particulars. (AI Summary)

The A.O. has  made addtion u/s. 40A(b) on account  excess interest payment to relative (18%-12%= 6%. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) can levy  on the above addition

1 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Like 0
Replied on May 7, 2011
1.

I think you are talking abt 40(2)(b) provisions. Penalty can not be levied as it is neither inacccurate particulars nor concealment case.

It has also been held in the case of

Jhavar Properties (P) Limited. Versus Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax.

The case details is available at the following link: 

https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=59637

Recent Issues