Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Documents to be carried by a person-in-charge of a conveyance under bill to ship to model.

Pralhad Jadhav

'A' from Kerala places an order on 'B' from Maharashtra for supply of goods directly to customer 'C' in Karnataka.

Accordingly, B raises a tax invoice on A for supply of goods with ship to details of C. Parallely, A also raises a tax invoice on C. B per the instruction of A arranges for transport of goods to C and issues an E-way bill with details as present on tax invoice raised on A.

B handsover the copy of the e-way bill and tax invoice (raised on A) to the transporter. The transporter is now intercepted at the border of Karnataka and the flying squad officers are saying that the tax invoice raised by A to C should also be present. Since, tax invoice is not present when the interception is made, submission of same at later stage will not eliminate tax liability and penal consequences.

Dear Experts, your views are requested on the following:

1. Whether the transporter was required to carry the copy of the tax invoice raised by A on C where the movement was caused by B and copy of invoice raised by B on A was also present which provides the details of bill to and ship to party?

2. In case the transporter was required to carry the copy of invoice raised by A on C, and on providing the same after inception, whether tax liability can be raised and penalty can be imposed?

Transporters must carry supplier's tax invoice and e-way bill showing consignor and consignee; missing documents risk detention and penalties Where goods move under a bill-to/ship-to arrangement with the supplier causing movement, the transporter must carry the supplier's tax invoice and e-way bill showing consignor and consignee; a separate invoice issued by the bill-to party need not accompany the goods for purposes of movement if the supplier's invoice already shows the ship-to details. Failure to produce required documents at interception can attract detention, verification and penal consequences, but furnishing missing documents later typically aids resolution and may avoid or reduce penalties unless there is evidence of tax evasion or fraud; whether tax/penalty is ultimately imposed depends on facts and administrative discretion. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues