Dear Forum Experts,
Suppliers are reportedly dispatching goods on an “approval basis” and delaying GST invoice issuance until customer approval, relying on Section 31(7)CGST Act 2017. While this provision allows invoicing at supply or within six months of removal, it appears open to abuse for cash-flow management and revenue deferment. Delivery challans under Rule 55 substitute tax invoices during transit, yet inadequate safeguards may enable artificial approval schemes.
Why cant a registered person can take benefit of this provision to defer the liability? Is there any case law, high court ruling on this?
Suppliers Misusing Section 31(7) CGST to Delay GST Invoices on Approval Basis Goods Delivery Suppliers are using Section 31(7) of the CGST Act 2017 to delay GST invoicing on goods sent on an approval basis, potentially abusing the provision intended to allow invoicing within six months of removal. Delivery challans serve as temporary substitutes for tax invoices during transit, but lack of safeguards may enable artificial approval arrangements to defer tax liability. While registered persons can benefit from this provision if legitimately structured, transactions where goods are effectively sold before invoice issuance do not qualify as sale on approval. Relevant guidance includes CBIC Circular No.108/27/2019-GST, and careful consideration of transaction facts is necessary to ensure compliance and prevent misuse. (AI Summary)