Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Audit u/s.65 completed for 2017-2023 period. Scrutiny Notice received u/s.61

Raam Srinivasan Swaminathan Kalpathi

Our company was subjected to GST department audit for the years 2017-2020 and also from 2020-2023 tax years u/s. 65. Now department has again intimated discrepancy upon scrutiny of Returns u/s. 61 for 2019-20 and 2021-22.  Request the distinguished experts their view and the way forward.  Profuse thanks

GST audit under section 65 followed by section 61 scrutiny clarified as permissible, subject to section 6(2)(b) safeguards A taxpayer audited under GST section 65 for 2017-2023 later received scrutiny notices under section 61 for some of the same periods. Forum experts differed: some argued repeat scrutiny post-audit is impermissible and contrary to CBIC instructions and judicial precedents that discourage overlap between audit and scrutiny, while others maintained there is no express statutory bar, subject to section 6(2)(b) and limitation under sections 73/74. It was noted that ADT-02 does not grant a 'clean chit' and fresh issues or subsequently detected discrepancies may still be examined. The taxpayer ultimately complied, resubmitted records, paid minor late fees, and received closure (ASMT-12) without additional tax demand. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues