Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

SCN of multiple years under section 74

SUSHIL BANSAL

Dera experts,

Our client received one SCN u/s 74 of FY 18-19 & 19-20 for the alleged fake purchase & thereby proposed disallowance of ITC & liability for Int & penalty. In the summary of DRC 01, the tax amount has been shown in FY 18-19 columns, though our alleged fake purchases are in FY 19-20. Now if we reply that during FY 18-19 we have not made any such purchases & then in assessment whether we will be taxed in FY 18-19 or 19-20. & if the dept does not issue a separate SCN for FY 19-20 before 30.09.2025, then whether our matter is over.

plz guide

Single Show Cause Notice Under GST Section 74 Must Separate Financial Years for Valid Tax Demands A client received a single show cause notice (SCN) under GST Section 74 covering two financial years for alleged fake purchases and disallowance of input tax credit. The SCN and accompanying summary incorrectly attribute tax demand for the earlier year, while the disputed transactions pertain to the later year. Legal advice emphasizes that each financial year must be assessed separately with clear year-wise breakups due to independent limitation periods under Section 74. A combined SCN lacking specificity may violate principles of natural justice and lead to invalid demands for the later year. Courts have held that if a separate SCN for the later year is not issued before the statutory deadline, the department loses jurisdiction to raise demands for that year. Additionally, procedural rules require issuance of specific notices before SCNs for periods prior to October 2020. Thus, failure to issue a timely SCN for the later year effectively closes the matter for that period. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues