Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

FY 2021-22 ITC EXCESS CLAIMED SUPPLIER NOT FILLED IN GSTR-1

DURAI RAJ

You have availed excess ITC in GSTR-3B as compared to the tax declared by your suppliers in their GSTR-1 DRC-01 Notice how we have claimed ITC Based on  Available purchase bills how to rectify this notice

Excess ITC Claims Must Be Reversed Under Section 50(3) Unless Valid Documents Prove Eligibility A taxpayer claimed excess input tax credit (ITC) in GSTR-3B compared to the supplier's declared tax in GSTR-1, triggering a DRC-01 notice. The issue requires reconciliation between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A/2B to verify accuracy. If excess ITC was wrongly claimed, it must be reversed with interest under Section 50(3) of the CGST Act. However, if the supplier failed to file but the recipient has valid documentation, courts have provided relief, recognizing that lawful ITC should not be denied solely due to supplier non-compliance. Section 16(2)(c) mandates that tax must be paid by the supplier for ITC eligibility, but judicial precedents, including a High Court ruling, have favored genuine taxpayers in such disputes. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues