Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 120175
Like 0 Bookmark

ITC Excess Claimed but No Revenue Loss to Government (FY 2019–20)

Date 24 Jun 2025
Replies 9 Replies
Views 2465 Views
Excess Input Tax Credit: reversal with interest and procedural refund required; absence of fraud may mitigate penalty exposure.
Excess claim of Input Tax Credit must be reversed with interest if utilized, and any excess tax paid should be pursued by refund through proper procedure; an offsetting excess payment does not substitute for required reversal. Invocation of fraud-targeted provisions can be contested where there is no fraudulent intent or gross negligence, but the taxpayer carries the burden of proof to establish entitlement and procedural compliance. Procedural correction, documentary evidence, and demonstrating absence of revenue loss may mitigate penalty exposure though relief depends on strict adherence to statutory processes. (AI Summary)

Dear Members,

One of our clients by mistake claimed more ITC in FY 2019–20, but at the same time, he also paid extra tax in GSTR-3B compared to GSTR-1 for the same period. So, there is no loss to the government, and there was no bad intention behind it.

We are in the process of replying to a Show Cause Notice issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act.

If anyone has dealt with a similar case or has any relevant High Court/Tribunal judgments supporting the view that penalty should not be imposed where there is no revenue loss and no fraud, please share.

Thanks in advance!

9 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues