Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

ITC Excess Claimed but No Revenue Loss to Government (FY 2019–20)

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....TC Excess Claimed but No Revenue Loss to Government (FY 2019–20)<br> Query (Issue) Started By: - Tushar Malik Dated:- 24-6-2025 Last Reply Date:- 29-6-2025 Goods and Services Tax - GST<br>Got 9 Replies<br>GST<br>Dear Members, One of our clients by mistake claimed more ITC in FY 2019-20, but at the same time, he also paid extra tax in GSTR-3B compared to GSTR-1 for the same period. So, there is ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....no loss to the government, and there was no bad intention behind it. We are in the process of replying to a Show Cause Notice issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act. If anyone has dealt with a similar case or has any relevant High Court/Tribunal judgments supporting the view that penalty should not be imposed where there is no revenue loss and no fraud, please share. Thanks in advance! Reply ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....By Sadanand Bulbule: The Reply: Plz refer the following: General disciplines related to penalty. Section 126. (1) No officer under this Act shall impose any penalty for minor breaches of tax regulations or procedural requirements and in particular, any omission or mistake in documentation which is easily rectifiable and made without fraudulent intent or gross negligence. So if there is no frau....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dulent intent, no gross negligence, and the mistake is procedural, penalty may be avoided, especially if there is no revenue loss. You need to convince the authority with cogent documents. Case law: M/s. Hindustan Steel Ltd Vs. State of Orissa [1978 AIR 1548]. (This is under pre-GST law, but often cited). Reply By KASTURI SETHI: The Reply: Dear querist, "One of our clients by mistake claimed ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....more ITC in FY 2019-20, but at the same time, he also paid extra tax in&nbsp;GSTR-3B&nbsp;compared to&nbsp;GSTR-1&nbsp;for the same period. So, there is no loss to the government, and there was no bad intention behind it." Your approach is not correct. Two issues are involved. Excess claim of ITC and Excess payment of GST. Both are different issues. Excess ITC taken should be reversed along with ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....interest (ITC must have been used by now) and claim refund for tax paid in excess. This is the right procedure de jure.&nbsp;&nbsp; You cannot intermingle both issues and take the plea that there is no revenue loss. A tax payer cannot self-adjust on ones own volition. Proper procedure has to be followed. I am not doubting the intention of your client but your client will have to prove his innoce....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nce. Burden of proof is cast upon the tax payer who avails ITC under Section 155 of CGST Act. Regarding the case laws on the ground of no-revenue-loss, there is a plethora of judgments available. Reply By KASTURI SETHI: The Reply: Suppose excess ITC taken has been utilised, then the loss of revenue (interest) has been caused. In that situation, there will be no use of tracing out case laws on t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he issue of "no revenue loss has been caused". Reply By Alkesh Jani: The Reply: Shri Kasturiji Sir, I agree with your views, just to add that ITC if utilized will be treated as loss to the revenue. ITC is vested right but if taken legitimately, in simple language by adhering to conditions and restriction if any, also by following the proper procedure known to law. Thanks With Regards&nbsp; R....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eply By Shilpi Jain: The Reply: Take a stand that the excess paid GST should be regarded as payment of the excess ITC taken. Reply By Padmanathan KV: The Reply: Section 126 does not apply to penalty under section 74. Pls see Section 126(6) of the Act. Reply By Padmanathan KV: The Reply: Assuming that the excess payment is in same head as excess ITC availed, you can take a stand that such exce....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ss payment should be treated as ITC reversal. Claiming refund of excess payment and reversal of ITC excess availed is only procedural, and in substance if there is no loss of revenue you can expect some relief at the Appeal stage. Also, invocation of section 74 does not seem to be proper since there has be fraud, willful-misstatement or suppression of fact with intend to evade tax. This may also ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....be contested. Reply By Tushar Malik: The Reply: Thank you everyone for taking out time to respond to my queries. I truly appreciate your support and valuable inputs. Your guidance really helped me gain clarity. Grateful for your time and effort! Reply By KASTURI SETHI: The Reply: I am afraid to say so.Truly, honestly and sincerely speaking, I foresee&nbsp; no positive response from the departm....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent on such adjustment. Fat chance.<br> Discussion Forum - Knowledge Sharing ....