Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

ITC availed after time limit prescribed as per section 16(4)

vaibhav agrawal

GSTR 3B for the FY 2020-21 was filed on 31 March 2022. Now department is raising concern over availment of ITC as the same has been availed beyond time prescribed in section 16(4) and 16(5). Guidance required regarding fight with the department over the said issue.

Taxpayer Challenges Late Input Tax Credit Claim Beyond Statutory Deadline in Complex GST Compliance Dispute A taxpayer filed GSTR 3B for fiscal year 2020-21 on 31 March 2022, claiming input tax credit (ITC) beyond the prescribed time limit under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act. The tax department raised concerns about ITC availment after the statutory deadline. Potential counter-arguments include principles of substantial compliance, genuine transactions, and absence of revenue loss. However, legal experts suggest limited chances of success due to strict statutory interpretation and Supreme Court's rigid stance on time frame adherence. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
YAGAY andSUN on May 22, 2025

The department's contention hinges on Section 16(4) of the CGST Act, which mandates that ITC for any invoice or debit note must be availed before the due date of filing GSTR-3B for September of the following financial year or the date of filing the annual return, whichever is earlier. For FY 2020-21, this deadline was extended due to the pandemic and ultimately fixed as 30 November 2021. If ITC was claimed in GSTR-3B filed on 31 March 2022, it technically falls outside the prescribed timeline.

To counter the department’s objection, one can argue based on principles of substantial compliance and absence of revenue loss, especially if the supplier has paid the tax and transactions are genuine and reflected in GSTR-2A/2B. Judicial precedents have, in some instances, favored taxpayers on such grounds. Also, if there was ambiguity or notification-based extension, the same should be cited. A detailed representation with evidence of eligibility, matching entries, and bona fide intent should be submitted to contest the disallowance.

KASTURI SETHI on May 23, 2025

In my view, chances are bleak.

Sadanand Bulbule on May 23, 2025

Considering the strict legal position of Section 16[4] & 16 [5], the authorities are not "royal" to extend the benefits of ITC beyond the statutory time frame fixed. They are also bound by the same time frame and answerable to the law. Even the CAG would not approve such action of the authorities.

KASTURI SETHI on May 23, 2025

Hon'ble Supreme Court is very strict regarding adherence to time frame  laid down in the GST Acts. One has to be pro-active in one's own interest.

YAGAY andSUN on May 23, 2025

Please refer our inputs as mentioned above specifically "Also, if there was ambiguity or notification-based extension, the same should be cited".

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues