Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

TDS paid without purchase of property

Deepak Bubna

Hello,

When a sale deed was not executed yet the potential buyer paid TDS on entire consideration of the agreement, the onus to prove that sale did not take place shall lie on the department or the assessee ? The assessee has made every possible document available to prove that sale did not take place. This transaction was not reported in SFT either as required u/s 258BA of the Act. Since the seller is non-cooperative and has not even returned the amount paid as advance, confirmation from the seller is hard to obtain.

 

Thanks

Property Buyer Challenges TDS Payment Without Sale Deed, Shifts Burden of Proof to Tax Department A potential property buyer paid TDS without executing a sale deed and seeks clarification on burden of proof. The reply indicates that when substantial documentary evidence demonstrates the sale did not occur, the tax department bears the onus to prove otherwise. TDS payment alone does not confirm property transfer, and non-reporting in statutory forms, along with lack of seller cooperation, supports the buyer's claim of no transaction completion. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
YAGAY andSUN on May 22, 2025

In such a case, where the assessee has already furnished substantial documentary evidence to establish that the sale did not materialize—such as cancellation agreement, legal notices, absence of possession, and non-registration of the sale deed—the onus shifts to the department to prove otherwise. Payment of TDS under Section 194-IA, by itself, does not conclusively establish transfer of property under the Income Tax Act or the Transfer of Property Act. The department cannot solely rely on TDS deduction to infer that the transaction was completed, especially in the absence of registered title transfer or possession.

Furthermore, the non-reporting of the transaction in the SFT by the registrar and lack of corroborative documents from the seller support the assessee’s claim that the sale did not take place. In such cases, judicial precedents have held that where the assessee has discharged the primary burden of proof, the department must bring on record substantive material to rebut the claim. Non-cooperation from the seller cannot be held against the assessee, particularly where bona fide efforts and records substantiate the assessee’s position.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues