Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

TDS Return Default for Foreign Party Without PAN – Need Guidance

Ramanathan Seshan

Dear Experts,

We have a case involving a foreign vendor who does not have a PAN. While filing the quarterly TDS return (Form 27Q) using the NSDL FVU utility, we encountered an error that prevented the generation of the FVU file—even though we provided the vendor’s email ID, Tax Identification Number (TIN), contact number, and address.

To proceed, we selected 'C – Higher Rate of TDS may be applicable due to non-availability of PAN' under the remarks column. This allowed us to generate the FVU file. However, as per provisions of the Act higher deduction does not apply to non-residents without PAN. As a result of we tagging 'C', we received a default in the TDS return for short deduction of TDS.

Now, when we try to remove the remark through the TRACES portal, it does not allow us to make the change, and the default still persists.

Has anyone faced a similar issue? Is there any way to resolve this—perhaps by submitting a written representation to the department? If so, to whom should it be addressed?

Regards,

S Ram

Foreign Vendor TDS Compliance: Navigating Identification Challenges with Non-Resident Exemption Under Rule 37BC A foreign vendor without a PAN created challenges during TDS return filing. The NSDL utility required selecting a remark indicating higher TDS, despite Rule 37BC allowing exemption for non-residents providing specific identification details. The system generated a default for short deduction, and the TRACES portal prevented remark removal. Recommended resolution strategies include filing a correction return, submitting justification documents, and potentially contacting the jurisdictional TDS Assessing Officer. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues