Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

GSTAT. HOW LONG TO WAIT?

Sadanand Bulbule

Dear all

In the absence of non-constitution of GSTAT, the genuine litigants are forced to approach the State High Courts which are already over flooded with disputes. Is it a herculean task for the Search cum Selection Committee to select/appoint the most eligible members? Despite 8 years of GST regime, when the GSTAT is likely to see the sunlight?

This is the genuine grievance of most people. Walls are ready, but the will is missing. Indecision is the biggest thing that stands in the way of progress. Can the concerned authorities unitedly work for the urgent constitution of GSTAT to spin justice? Just one more final effort makes the tagline-ease of doing business-successful.

GST Appellate Tribunal Remains Unestablished, Taxpayers Forced to Navigate Complex Legal Channels After Eight Years A discussion forum post highlights the prolonged delay in establishing the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), despite eight years since GST implementation. The post criticizes authorities for not constituting the tribunal, forcing litigants to approach overcrowded state high courts. A respondent agrees, noting government prioritizes tax collection over taxpayer facilities and highlighting systemic administrative inefficiency. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues